Find the Vulnerabilities Before Your Users Do

A 5-day adversarial testing campaign - 100+ attack vectors, prompt injection resistance scoring, safety boundary mapping, and hardening recommendations.

Duration: 5 days Team: 1-2 Senior Red-Team Specialists

You might be experiencing...

You deployed guardrails but have never systematically tested whether they hold against adversarial inputs.
A user discovered they could extract your system prompt - you found out from a Twitter thread.
Your AI agent has tool-calling capabilities but you have not tested what happens when an adversarial user tries to abuse them.
Enterprise customers require adversarial testing documentation before procurement sign-off.

The Red-Team Sprint is genai.qa’s adversarial testing engagement - a 5-day campaign that systematically attacks your GenAI application to find the vulnerabilities that automated scanners miss and users will eventually discover.

Why Human-Led Red-Teaming

Automated LLM security scanners test known attack patterns from a database. They run the same prompt injection templates against every application. They are a necessary baseline, and we use them as part of our toolkit.

But the attacks that actually breach GenAI applications in production are not in any database. They are context-specific. They exploit the unique combination of your system prompt, your retrieval pipeline, your tool-calling configuration, and your safety boundary definitions. Finding these requires a human adversary who understands your application’s specific architecture and can design creative, multi-step attack chains.

What automated scanners miss:

  • Multi-turn social engineering - Gradually shifting the conversation context over 5-10 turns to bypass safety boundaries that hold against single-turn attacks.
  • Indirect prompt injection - Embedding instructions in documents, user content, or retrieved context that the LLM executes as if they were system instructions.
  • Tool-use exploitation - Manipulating an AI agent’s tool-calling behavior to execute unintended actions, access unauthorized data, or escalate permissions.
  • Encoding attacks - Using base64, ROT13, Unicode variations, and other encoding techniques to bypass content filters that only match plaintext patterns.

What You Receive

Every Red-Team Sprint delivers a comprehensive vulnerability catalog that your engineering team can act on immediately. Each finding includes the attack vector, the specific bypass technique, reproduction steps, severity rating, and a recommended fix with implementation guidance.

The prompt injection resistance scorecard gives you a quantified measure of your application’s defensive posture - a number you can report to your board, share with enterprise customers, and improve over time.

For teams facing enterprise procurement requirements, the adversarial test report is formatted as audit-grade documentation that satisfies security review questionnaires.

Book a free scope call to discuss your application’s adversarial testing needs.

Engagement Phases

Day 1

Threat Modeling & Attack Surface Mapping

Map the application's attack surface: prompt injection vectors, system prompt exposure, tool-calling capabilities, safety boundary definitions, and data exfiltration paths.

Days 2-4

Adversarial Testing Campaign

Execute 100+ adversarial attack vectors including prompt injection (direct and indirect), jailbreak chains, multi-turn social engineering, safety boundary probing, tool misuse, and data extraction attempts.

Day 5

Vulnerability Report & Hardening Recommendations

Deliver adversarial test report with severity-rated vulnerability catalog, prompt injection resistance scorecard, safety boundary map, and hardening recommendations.

Deliverables

Adversarial test report (100+ attack vectors tested with detailed results)
Vulnerability catalog with severity ratings (Critical / High / Medium / Low)
Prompt injection resistance scorecard (direct injection, indirect injection, multi-turn)
Safety boundary map (what the AI will and will not do under adversarial pressure)
Hardening recommendations with implementation guidance and priority ranking

Before & After

MetricBeforeAfter
Adversarial CoverageNo systematic adversarial testing - vulnerabilities discovered by users100+ attack vectors tested across OWASP LLM Top 10 categories
Prompt Injection ResistanceUnknown - guardrails untested against creative adversarial inputsQuantified resistance score with specific bypass examples and fixes
Enterprise ReadinessNo adversarial testing documentation for procurementAudit-grade red-team report suitable for enterprise security reviews

Tools We Use

Promptfoo (red-team mode) Custom jailbreak harnesses OWASP LLM Top 10 Garak

Frequently Asked Questions

Will your testing break our production system?

No. We test against staging or sandbox environments. For production testing, we coordinate timing and scope with your engineering team and use rate-limited, non-destructive techniques.

What is the price?

USD 7,500 for standard red-teaming, USD 10,000 for red-team + safety boundary mapping. Fixed-price with guaranteed deliverables.

How does this differ from automated LLM security scanners?

Automated tools test known attack patterns. Our red-team specialists design creative, context-specific attack chains - multi-turn social engineering, indirect prompt injection via retrieved documents, agent permission escalation - that scanners cannot generate.

Do you cover the OWASP LLM Top 10?

Yes. Every red-team sprint covers all 10 OWASP LLM vulnerability categories: prompt injection, insecure output handling, training data poisoning, model denial of service, supply chain vulnerabilities, sensitive information disclosure, insecure plugin design, excessive agency, overreliance, and model theft.

Break It Before They Do.

Book a free 30-minute GenAI QA scope call. We review your AI application, identify the top risks, and show you exactly what to test before you ship.

Talk to an Expert